Skip to content

Add documentation and release notes entry for the Terraform support for dynamic team tokens feature - #31260

Merged
jonathanfrappier merged 6 commits into
hashicorp:mainfrom
cbiguet:docs/tf-dynamic-team-token
Jul 12, 2025
Merged

Add documentation and release notes entry for the Terraform support for dynamic team tokens feature#31260
jonathanfrappier merged 6 commits into
hashicorp:mainfrom
cbiguet:docs/tf-dynamic-team-token

Conversation

@cbiguet

@cbiguet cbiguet commented Jul 11, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

This PR updates the Vault documentation to reflect the inclusion of the following feature in Vault 1.20: Support for dynamic team tokens in Terraform Cloud secrets engine.

  • Added line item in release notes
  • Updated documentation for the TFC secrets engine
  • Updated API documentation for the TFC secrets engine

Note: This should be included in the 1.20 documentation, not sure if I need to add a backport label since its the latest version?

TODO only if you're a HashiCorp employee

  • Backport Labels: If this fix needs to be backported, use the appropriate backport/ label that matches the desired release branch. Note that in the CE repo, the latest release branch will look like backport/x.x.x, but older release branches will be backport/ent/x.x.x+ent.
  • LTS: If this fixes a critical security vulnerability or severity 1 bug, it will also need to be backported to the current LTS versions of Vault. To ensure this, use all available enterprise labels.
  • ENT Breakage: If this PR either 1) removes a public function OR 2) changes the signature
    of a public function, even if that change is in a CE file, double check that
    applying the patch for this PR to the ENT repo and running tests doesn't
    break any tests. Sometimes ENT only tests rely on public functions in CE
    files.
  • Jira: If this change has an associated Jira, it's referenced either
    in the PR description, commit message, or branch name.
  • RFC: If this change has an associated RFC, please link it in the description.
  • ENT PR: If this change has an associated ENT PR, please link it in the
    description. Also, make sure the changelog is in this PR, not in your ENT PR.

PCI review checklist

  • I have documented a clear reason for, and description of, the change I am making.
  • If applicable, I've documented a plan to revert these changes if they require more than reverting the pull request.
  • If applicable, I've documented the impact of any changes to security controls.

Examples of changes to security controls include using new access control methods, adding or removing logging pipelines, etc.

@cbiguet
cbiguet requested review from a team as code owners July 11, 2025 21:16
@hashicorp-cla-app

hashicorp-cla-app Bot commented Jul 11, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@hashicorp-cla-app

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check

Thank you for your submission! We require that all contributors sign our Contributor License Agreement ("CLA") before we can accept the contribution. Read and sign the agreement

Learn more about why HashiCorp requires a CLA and what the CLA includes

Have you signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Recheck it.

@jonathanfrappier
jonathanfrappier merged commit e845a46 into hashicorp:main Jul 12, 2025
52 of 54 checks passed
Erfankam pushed a commit to Erfankam/vault that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2025
…or dynamic team tokens feature (hashicorp#31260)

* Add TFC Dynamic Team Credentials feature to Vault 1.20 release notes

* Update website/content/docs/secrets/terraform.mdx

* Update website/content/api-docs/secret/terraform.mdx

* Remove todo in release notes

* Amend Legacy Team section in docs

* Add description field to api-docs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docs hashicorp-contributed-pr If the PR is HashiCorp (i.e. not-community) contributed pr/no-changelog pr/no-milestone

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants